A Moral Responsibility: Osage Should’ve Fought For Themselves, But They DIDN’T

In a world plagued by evil, the question of whether ordinary people have a moral responsibility to stand up against it is a topic of great philosophical and ethical debate.

Killers of the Flower Moon brought this issue to light, The Osage People fought back, but to avail.

Should they have fought harder?

Were they chicken for following their rules?

Should they have gone full vigilante?

The concept of morality, rooted in the principles of ethics and philosophy, plays a crucial role in shaping our understanding of right and wrong. This article explores the arguments for and against the moral responsibility of individuals to confront evil, with a particular focus on the philosophical concept of utilitarianism.

Background

Before delving into the arguments surrounding moral responsibility, it is essential to establish a foundation for our discussion. Evil, in its broadest sense, refers to actions or behaviors that cause harm, suffering, or destruction. The philosophy of utilitarianism, developed by thinkers like Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, posits that the right course of action is one that maximizes overall happiness and minimizes suffering for the…